Current SPAD.neXt Release: 0.9.12.123

This forum has closed. Please join our Discord Community.

SPAD.neXt online services are no longer available for SPAD.neXt Versions < 0.9.11.5

Normalizer usage

Discussions about new feature ideas.
To request a new feature please open a ticket
Locked

Normalizer usage

Poll ended at 01 Dec 2015, 19:58

I don't use them
2
67%
I want to keep it as it is (this will also mean you will not be able to change units)
0
No votes
Offering the datadefinitions in the tree-browser with different normalizer is fine
1
33%
 
Total votes: 3

User avatar
c0nnex
Site Admin
Posts: 5469
Joined: 10 Mar 2015, 21:52
Location: Munich, Germany
Contact:
Status: Offline

Normalizer usage

Post by c0nnex » 28 Nov 2015, 19:58

Is any of you using the normalizer features?
Like having functions bound to the same offset but using different normalizers?

I think the normalizer-stuff over-complicate things a bit, and pondering if I either should remove them , or offer the Datadefinitions separately for each normalizer.
In later case there would be 2 Datadefinition e.g. for "Altitude of Aircraft" , one in Meter and one in Feet in the Definition-Selection-Tree and for the SimConnect units one could select the unit you want to have

Opinions? Please vote

Locked